Monday, February 29, 2016

Unit 6 Reflection






Thursday, February 25, 2016

Owl Pellet Lab

In the owl pellet lab, we were given an owl pellet (indigestible remains owls regurgitate), and broke it apart in an attempt to find out what the owl had eaten. We used forceps and a probe to pull apart the compact mass and found a lot of fur, and a broken up skeleton. We separated the bones into groups based on similarity, and then tried to find out what it was.

Our owl pellet skeleton was quite incomplete, there was no complete skull, which made it difficult to distinguish what it was. However, we decided that the organism was a vole -- based solely on the shape of the scapula, and the radius and ulna. The diagram of the scapula for a vole was the only one that matched up with the physical scapula bone of our organism. The radius and ulna did not match at the ends of the bones for the other small rodents, and the diagram for the radius and ulna matched the organism's bone the most closely. Despite the incomplete skeleton, we strongly concluded that it was a vole.

 The scapula and ulna and radius looked very similar to human bones -- not at all in size, but the shape of them could almost have been the same, just shrunken. In the scapula, there was a center ridge that humans do not have, but it was easy to tell that it was the same bone, just in a vole. The spine was all separated into different sections, but we also distinguished very quickly that it was the spine. It looked just like a human skeleton, of course again on a much smaller scale. A human radius and ulna and a vole radius and ulna look incredibly similar, again just minimized. 


Vole and shrew
leg bone comparison charts
Spine



Close up of scapula compared to diagram
Vole and shrew comparison chart
(skull, scapula, pelvis)
Close up of ulna and radius compared to diagram